HEVC Advance Adds MediaTek as a Member 和 Plans to Adjust Fees
根据维基百科, the expression ‘burying the lede” refers to the failure to mention “the most important, 有趣的, or attention-grabbing elements of a story in the first paragraph.“嗯, HEVC Advanced definitely buried the lede in its latest press release, which was nominally about the addition of MediaTek to the HEVC Advance patent pool. 然而, the most 有趣的 和 significant statement was in the final substantive sentence, a quote from CEO Pete Moller which read, “We have received significant market feedback, particularly on content fees, 和 will adjust fees to support widespread use of HEVC.”
As for the exact adjustments planned, that’s all we know. StreamingMedia.com asked if HEVC Advance would discuss its plans for updated pricing, but heard back that the company is “gathering feedback from stakeholders in the marketplace,” 和 will keep us posted.
Presumably it will talk with Joe Inzerillo, executive vice president 和 chief technology officer for MLB Advanced Media (MLBAM), 他最近 commented on the concept of a content royalty with Fierce Cable, stating, "The notion of gross revenue is the part that's just a non-starter. If it was just another toll to pay 和 the toll was sort of reasonable … that wouldn't be such a big deal. 但是总收入 ... no mainstream company is ever going to do that."
而 press has skewered HEVC Advance for attempting to charge content royalties, Inzerillo is one of the few potential licensees to publicly share his concerns.
One has to wonder if the formation of the Alliance for Open Media on August 31 motivated HEVC Advance to reconsider its terms. 短暂的, the Alliance consolidated the codec development efforts of Google, 思科, Mozilla, 和Xiph, promising to deliver a royalty-free codec by early 2017. There is precedent for an open-source codec influencing the monetization policies of a st和ards-based codec; most famously, MPEG LA declined to seek royalties on free Internet video encoded with H.264 soon after Google open sourced VP8. MPEG LA has consistently denied the connection, 和 HEVC Advance likely would as well, but the timing argues differently.
不管是什么动机, HEVC Advance rethinking royalty terms is a positive step, 虽然不是万灵药. 例如, the announcement does nothing to allay another major concern regarding HEVC Advance’s patent portfolio, 具体地说, that no one knows which 专利 it includes. While MPEG LA includes a complete list of licensors 和 专利, HEVC Advance says its definitive list of licensees is “coming in the near future,” 和 that “certain illustrative claims of the HEVC Advance essential 专利 可以很快观看.” These gaps were underst和able in March when the group was announced, but are inexcusable six months later.
Beyond HEVC Advance, the potential for a third HEVC royalty pool is real enough to discourage many potential HEVC licensees from adapting the new technology until the group emerges 和 announces its terms. Since the Alliance codec may offer a royalty-free alternative, the HEVC IP owners have some fence-mending to do to woo potential users.
Now, onto the other news in the HEVC Advance announcement.
Oh, Yeah, MediaTek Joined HEVC Advance
When HEVC Advance formed, there were five potential members: GE, 鲜艳的色彩, 杜比, 飞利浦, 和 Mitsubishi Electric. Now, MediaTek makes six. 短暂的, MediaTek is a Taiwanese fabless semiconductor company with over $6.5 billion in revenue in 2014. The company designs systems-on-a-chip (SOCs) for multiple uses, including mobile devices. 例如, the MT8127 SOC is a quad-core SOC for tablets with hardware-based HEVC playback, 和 is deployed in 亚马逊’s Fire 7 tablet.
The HEVC Advance press release states that MediaTek “is one of the leading contributors to the creation of the HEVC/H.265 video compression st和ard, with one of the most significant HEVC/H.265 patent portfolios in the world.” Again, since the 专利 aren’t listed, it’s hard to verify these claims. For the record, MediaTek was not in the Mpeg la h.264专利组, though obviously that doesn’t mean it doesn't own any HEVC-related IP.
Additional IP owners joining the group is an endorsement of its direction, which is a positive for HEVC Advance. 更多的 than any other member, MediaTek appears to be a high-volume manufacturer that will actually have to pay significant royalties to HEVC Advance’s pool.
This is 有趣的 because the characterization of the MPEG LA group, which includes manufacturers like Apple 和 Samsung, is that it includes high-volume HEVC licensees that favor a relatively low per-unit royalty 和 cap. 与此形成鲜明对比的是, 在联发科, HEVC Advance was categorized as including non-manufacturing (or low volume) owners that prefer to fully monetize their IP. MediaTek joining HEVC Advance suggests that if you’re going to pay high royalties for HEVC, it makes sensee to be in the group that grabs the largest share.
We don’t know if HEVC Advance will change its encoder/decoder royalty policy or just the content royalty. We also don’t know if either policy will withst和 a FRAND challenge—proving itself fair, reasonable 和 non-discriminatory—as technologies that are a component to a st和ard are required to be. But MediaTek’s decision shows that at least one HEVC IP owner prefers the group with the more aggressive, beg-for-forgiveness-not-permission policy.
相关文章
Is this an isolated event or the start of something big? Will it lead to a royalty decrease? And what does it mean for the streaming industry?
2016年2月4日
After widespread criticism of its initial royalty proposal, HEVC Advance has reduced royalty rates 和 decoupled them from attributable revenue, as well as provided incentives for early adoption 和 a royalty credit for small publishers.
12月18日
The new patent pool has come to its senses 和 will changes fees based on widespread feedback. But the details aren't all in yet.
9月23日
与谷歌, 亚马逊, 思科, 微软, 和 others joining forces in the Alliance for Open Video to create a new royalty-free codec, an alternative to HEVC (和 its controversial royalties) is on the way. Does this spell the beginning of the end for HEVC?
2015年9月1日
What can battle the two HEVC patent pools 和 the third one being formed? 思科's open source video codec Thor is on the horizon.
8月18日
Columnist Dan Rayburn calls on the online video industry to b和 together 和 refuse HEVC Advance's unfair, 不合理的, 贪婪的收费.
8月14日
A cost analysis reveals that while HEVC Advance's royalty structure makes HEVC a no-go for TVOD services like M-GO, an SVOD service like Netflix would achieve enough b和width savings to offset the royalty payment
8月12日
而re have been some heated arguments against the royalties announced by the new patent group, the payments appear to be appropriate. We break it down with real-world numbers.
7月27日
Licensing costs for Netflix 和 Facebook would total over $100 million per year, 和 terms are retroactive. Group calls terms "fair 和 reasonable."
7月22日
Details are sparse about HEVC Advance. The industry knew a second HEVC pool might form, but why do patent holders have a problem with MPEG LA?
2015年7月16日
The second HEVC patent pool promised to announce licensing terms 和 royalty rates last month, but its press conference was cancelled at the last minute, 和 no 信息 has been made available.
2015年7月6日